Skip to main content

Hyung Mook Kang

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • Diploma (International), Yonsei University, 2021
    Major: Mathematics

Current Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1710.201Calculus ISpring 2026
MATH 1180.001College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 2700.401Linear Algebra and Vector GeometrySummer 10W 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1180.110College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1180.009College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 2700.002Linear Algebra and Vector GeometrySummer 5W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 2700.002Linear Algebra and Vector GeometrySpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 2700.004Linear Algebra and Vector GeometryFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 2700.400Linear Algebra and Vector GeometrySummer 10W 2023 Syllabus
MATH 1650.130Pre CalculusSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 2700.005Linear Algebra and Vector GeometryFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 2700.004Linear Algebra and Vector GeometrySummer 5W2 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 2700.007Linear Algebra and Vector GeometrySpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE