Skip to main content

Heather P. Wilson

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2017
    Major: Mathematics
  • BS, University of North Texas, 2015
    Major: Mathematics

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1100.130AlgebraSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1100.140AlgebraSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1190.001Business CalculusSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1190.004Business CalculusSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 350.013Beginning AlgebraFall 2023 Syllabus
MATH 1180.006College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1180.310College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 340.022Integrated Pre and Beginning AlgebraFall 2023 Syllabus
MATH 1680.540Elementary Probability and StatisticsFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1680.541Elementary Probability and StatisticsFall 2016 SPOT
MATH 1680.542Elementary Probability and StatisticsFall 2016 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE