Skip to main content

Hammad Khan

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Information Science

College: College of Information

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2021
    Major: Information Science
    Dissertation: Understanding the Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs) of Data Professionals in United States Academic Libraries
  • MS, University of North Texas, 2011
    Major: Library Science

Current Scheduled Teaching

INFO 5330.401Academic LibrariesSpring 2025
INFO 5000.406Information and Knowledge ProfessionsSpring 2025
INFO 5300.401Management of Information AgenciesFall 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

INFO 5330.001Academic LibrariesSummer 5W2 2024 SPOT
INFO 5330.001Academic LibrariesSpring 2024 SPOT
INFO 5000.006Information and Knowledge ProfessionsSpring 2024 SPOT
INFO 5000.004Information and Knowledge ProfessionsFall 2023 SPOT
INFO 5330.001Academic LibrariesSummer 5W2 2023 SPOT
INFO 5330.001Academic LibrariesSpring 2023 SPOT
INFO 5000.004Information and Knowledge ProfessionsFall 2022 SPOT
INFO 5330.001Academic LibrariesSummer 5W2 2022 SPOT
INFO 5330.001Academic LibrariesSpring 2019 SPOT
INFO 5330.005Academic LibrariesSpring 2019 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book

  • Du, Y., Khan, H.R. (2020). Data Science for Librarians. Santa Barbara, CA, ABC-Clio.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE