Faculty Profile

Huaibing Yu

Title
Ph.D. ABD
Department
Finance, Insurance, Real Estate and Law
College
College of Business

    

Education

PhD, University of North Texas, 2020.
Major: Finance
MA, University of Alabama, 2012.
Major: Economics
MBA, Hofstra University, 2011.
Major: Finance
BA, Xiamen University, 2010.
Major: Economics

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

FINA 4300.002, Financial Statement Analysis and Liquidity Management, Fall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 4200.003, Investments, Fall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 4300.001, Financial Statement Analysis and Liquidity Management, Summer 5W2 2020 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 4200.004, Investments, Spring 2020 Syllabus
FINA 3770.009, Finance, Fall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.001, Finance, Summer 5W2 2019 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.006, Finance, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.008, Finance, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Journal Article
Yu, H. (2019). Long-run Cointegration and Market Equilibrium in Large Cap Stocks. Other. 8(1), 13-32.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE