Skip to main content

Im H. Lai

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Information Technology and Decision Sciences

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2022
    Major: Business Computer Information Systems
    Dissertation: The Impact of Blockchain Food Tracing Information Quality and Trust on Intention to Purchase
  • MBA, University of North Texas, 2014
    Major: Business Administration - Information Technology
  • BBA, University of North Texas, 1995
    Major: Business Computer Information Systems

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

BCIS 5420.007Foundations of Database Management SystemsSpring 2023 SPOT
BCIS 5420.009Foundations of Database Management SystemsFall 2022 SPOT
BCIS 3610.007Basic Information SystemsFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
BCIS 3610.002Basic Information SystemsSummer 5W2 2020 Syllabus SPOT
BCIS 3615.001Visual Display of Business InformationSummer 5W2 2017 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Conference Proceeding

  • Lai, I.H., Kim, D., Jeong, E.J. (2016). Online Digital Game Addiction: How Does Social Relationship Impact Game Addiction. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS).
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE