Skip to main content

Idorenyin Udoh

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Rehabilitation and Health Services

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2024
    Major: Health Services Research - Applied Gerontology
    Dissertation: Subjective Aging in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Adults: Moderation by Healthcare Access and Mediation by Healthcare Resources

Current Scheduled Teaching

AGER 4750.400Sexuality and AgingFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

RHAB 3100.900Disability and SocietySummer 10W 2024 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 4200.900Physical and Psychosocial Aspects of DisabilitySpring 2024 SPOT
RHAB 4500.902Assessment in RehabilitationFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 4500.900Assessment in RehabilitationSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Chowdhury, D., Udoh, I. (2022). Women with disabilities and pregnancy: Understanding barriers, adversities, and health disparities from a Rehabilitation perspective. Journal of Rehabilitation Counseling Research and Practice. 43 (2)
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE