Skip to main content

Ignat Soroko

Title: Visiting Assistant Professor

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Oklahoma, 2018
    Major: Mathematics
    Dissertation: Dean Functions of Subgroups of Right-Angled Artin Groups
  • MS, Michigan State University, 2013
    Major: Mathematics

Current Scheduled Teaching

MATH 2000.002Discrete MathematicsSpring 2025
MATH 1190.004Business CalculusFall 2024 Syllabus
MATH 2700.008Linear Algebra and Vector GeometryFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1720.310Calculus IISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 2700.008Linear Algebra and Vector GeometryFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1720.310Calculus IISpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 2700.008Linear Algebra and Vector GeometryFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Soroko, I., Calvez, M. (2022). Property R∞ for some spherical and affine Artin–Tits groups. 25 (6) 1045-1054. Journal of Group Theory. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jgth-2022-0010/html
  • Soroko, I. (2021). Artin groups of types F4 and H4 are not commensurable with that of type D4. Topology and its Applications. 300 107770. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016686412100184X
  • Soroko, I., Kropholler, R., Leary, I. (2020). Uncountably many quasi-isometry classes of groups of type FP. American Journal of Mathematics. 142 (6) 1931-1944. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/772704/pdf
  • Soroko, I., Forester, M., Tao, J. (2020). Genus bounds in right-angled Artin groups. 64 (1) 233-253. Publicacions Matemàtiques. https://mat.uab.cat/pubmat/volums/navegador/108
  • Soroko, I. (2020). Realizable ranks of joins and intersections of subgroups in free groups. 30 (3) 625-666. International Journal of Algebra and Computation. https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S0218196720500149
  • Soroko, I. (2020). Linearity of some low-complexity mapping class groups.. Forum Mathematicum. 32 (2) 279-286. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/forum-2019-0184/html
  • Soroko, I., Brady, N. (2018). Dehn functions of subgroups of right-angled Artin groups.. Geometriae Dedicata. 200 197-239. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10711-018-0367-9
  • Software

  • Soroko, I. (2022). A GAP code for computing hypergraph index. https://github.com/ignatsoroko/HypergraphIndex
  • Video and Audiovisual Material

  • Soroko, I. (2022). Divergence in Coxeter groups. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Yr6GCEFtaw
  • Soroko, I. (2021). Commensurability of spherical Artin groups. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj0hOqydN-Y
  • Soroko, I. (2021). Groups of type FP: their quasi-isometry classes and homological Dehn functions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xoj8A5QdBUo
  • Soroko, I. (2020). Intersections and joins of subgroups in free groups. CIRM. Audiovisual resource.. http://dx.doi.org/10.24350/CIRM.V.19636903

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Soroko, I. (Principal), "AMS-Simons Travel Grant," sponsored by AMS and Simons Foundation, National, $4000 Funded. (2019 - 2023).
  • Soroko, I. (Principal), "Early-career AMS–NSF–Simons–ICM Travel Grant," sponsored by AMS, NSF, Simons Foundation, National, $1500 Funded. ( - 2022).
  • Soroko, I. (Principal), "Kovalevskaya Grant," sponsored by 2022 ICM Committee, International, $2000 Funded. ( - 2022).
  • Soroko, I. (Principal), "GEAR Graduate Internship," sponsored by MSRI, National, $7500 Funded. ( - 2016).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE