Skip to main content

Ian T. Cicco

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Music Education

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUED 5900.704Special ProblemsSummer 10W 2022 SPOT
MUED 2310.001Musicianship for Teaching ISpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUED 3100.002Musicianship for Teaching IISpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUED 3200.003Musicianship for Teaching IIISpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4148.776Student Teaching for Music Education MajorsSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUED 2310.001Musicianship for Teaching IFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUED 3100.001Musicianship for Teaching IIFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUED 3200.002Musicianship for Teaching IIIFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4148.773Student Teaching for Music Education MajorsFall 2021 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Cicco, I.T., Taylor, D. (2025). Aligning elementary and secondary band programs: Perceptions of music teacher educators..
  • Cicco, I.T., Taylor, D. (2025). Aligning elementary and secondary band programs: Perceptions of music teacher educators..
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE