Jordan Bernot
Title: Teaching Fellow
Department: Information Technology and Decision Sciences
College: College of Business
Curriculum Vitae
Curriculum Vitae LinkEducation
-
PhD, University of North Texas - In Progress,
Major: Information Technology & Decision Sciences
Specialization: Business Computer Information Systems
Current Scheduled Teaching
| BCIS 2610.003 | Introduction to Computers in Business | Spring 2026 | ||
| BCIS 4740.002 | Administration and Policy in Information Security | Fall 2025 | Syllabus | SPOT |
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
Previous Scheduled Teaching
| BCIS 4740.002 | Administration and Policy in Information Security | Fall 2025 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| BCIS 2610.407 | Introduction to Computers in Business | Summer 5W2 2025 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| BCIS 4740.405 | Administration and Policy in Information Security | Spring 2025 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| BCIS 4740.002 | Administration and Policy in Information Security | Fall 2024 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| BCIS 4740.005 | Administration and Policy in Information Security | Spring 2024 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| BCIS 4740.002 | Administration and Policy in Information Security | Fall 2023 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| BCIS 4740.005 | Administration and Policy in Information Security | Spring 2023 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| BCIS 2610.005 | Introduction to Computers in Business | Fall 2022 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| INFO 5737.004 | Information and Cyber Security | Spring 2022 | SPOT | |
| INFO 5737.002 | Information and Cyber Security | Fall 2021 | SPOT | |
| INFO 5737.202 | Information and Cyber Security | Fall 2020 | SPOT |
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
Published Intellectual Contributions
- Bernot, J., Kim, D. (2022). Discovering New Cybersecurity Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities, Pre-ICIS Workshop.
- Bernot, J., Kim, D. (2022). Firms Data Breach and Ransomware Exposure and Recovery Through the Analysis of Post Factum Remedial Actions. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2022/sig_sec/sig_sec/5
- Bernot, J., Kim, D. (2023). Discovering New Cybersecurity Knowledge Through Text. ICIS 2023.
- Bernot, J., Kim, D. (2022). Discovering New Cybersecurity Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities. Pre-ICIS Workshop: BIGS 2022.
- Bernot, J., Kim, D. (2022). Firms Data Breach and Ransomware Exposure and Recovery Through the Analysis of Post Factum Remedial Actions. AMCIS 2022.
- Douglas, M., Bernot, J., Kim, D. (2021). Analyzing Cybersecurity TKSs through Text Analysis.
- Bernot, J., Chang, H. (2020). Knowledge Management in Cybersecurity Education Using Concept Maps. Durham, North Carolina, The 16th International Conference on Knowledge Management (ICKM 2020).
Abstracts and Proceedings
Conference Proceeding
Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research
- Kim, D. (Principal), Bernot, J. (Supporting), "Enhancing Cybersecurity TKSs (Tasks, Knowledge, and Skills) for Cybersecurity Education and Workforce Development," Federal, $91368 Funded. (2022 - 2023).
- Kim, D. (Principal), Bernot, J. (Supporting), "Enhancing Cybersecurity Education and Workforce Development through Extraction of KSA (Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities) from Cybersecurity Job Listing Sites," Federal, $26000 Funded. (2021 - 2021).
Grant - Research
| Overall Summative Rating |
Challenge and Engagement Index |
Response Rate |
|---|---|---|
out of 5 |
out of 7 |
% of students responded |
-
Overall Summative Rating (median):
This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):- The course as a whole was
- The course content was
- The instructor’s contribution to the course was
- The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
-
Challenge and Engagement Index:
This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):- Do you expect your grade in this course to be
- The intellectual challenge presented was
- The amount of effort you put into this course was
- The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
- Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was