Faculty Profile

Joseph Michels

Joseph Michels

Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Marketing, Logistics, and Operations Management
College
College of Business

    

Education

MA, Naval War College, 1997.
Major: National Security Studies
MPA, University of Oklahoma, 1990.
PhD, Texas A&M, 1986.
MS, University of Southern California, 1980.
Major: Systems Management
BS, Weber State University, 1976.
Major: Electronic Engineering Technology

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

LSCM 5560.001, Strategic Logistics Management, Fall 2018 SPOT
OPSM 3830.004, Operations Management, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
LSCM 5560.001, Strategic Logistics Management, Fall 2017 SPOT
MGMT 3830.002, Operations Management, Spring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
LSCM 5560.001, Strategic Logistics Management, Fall 2016 SPOT
LSCM 5560.001, Strategic Logistics Management, Spring 2016
LSCM 5560.001, Strategic Logistics Management, Fall 2015 SPOT
LSCM 5560.001, Strategic Logistics Management, Spring 2015
LSCM 5560.001, Strategic Logistics Management, Fall 2014

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Conference Proceeding
Michels, J. B., Foglesong, R. H., Falvey, D. L. (1992). Organizational Downscaling of Military Maintenance Squadron. 23, 2381-2386. Pittsburg Conference.
Foglesong, R. H., Falvey, D. L., Michels, J. B. (1992). Restructuring the United States Air Force to Meet Tomorrow's Challenge. 23, 2369-2371. Pittsburg Conference.
Falvey, D. L., Michels, J. B., Foglesong, R. H. (1992). Total Quality Management: Barriers and Strategies in an Air Force Combat Unit. 23, 2373-2379. Pittsburg Conference.
Foglesong, R. H., Michels, J. B., Falvey, D. L. (1991). A Back to Basics Approach to Enhancing Combat Capabilty in Fighter Aircraft. 22, 2489-2494. Pittsburg Conference.
Michels, J. B., Falvey, D. L., Foglesong, R. H. (1991). A Parametric Analysis of a Tactical Fighter Wing's Combat Capability. 22, 2471-2479. Pittsburg Conference.
Falvey, D. L., Michels, J. B., Foglesong, R. H. (1991). Combat Ground Crew: An Accidental Experiment in Total Quality Management (TOM). 22, 2465-2470. Pittsburg Conference.
Blank, L. T., Michels, J. B. (1987). Software Planning Methodology. International Federation Operations Research Society.
Michels, J. B., Blank, L. T. (1986). Software Planning and Development Methodology fo a CIM Environment. Institute of Industrial Engineers, 1986 Fall Conference.
Michels, J. B., Shannon, R. E. (1983). Integration of Decision Support Systems into the Management Process. Institute of Industrial Engineers, 1983 Fall Conference.
Journal Article
Michels, J. B. (2010). Focused Logistics in 2010- A Civil Sector Force Multiplier for the Operational Commander. Air Force Journal of Logistics.
Michels, J. B. (1999). Tactical Fighter Wing Reorganization: The Implications for the Maintenance Officer. Air Force Journal of Logistics.
Michels, J. B., Light, R., Comstock, T. (1986). Club Involvement in the Volunteer Examiner Program. Other.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE