Skip to main content

Jill Denniston

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Rehabilitation and Health Services

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2018
    Major: Educational Psychology - Learning and Development
  • BS, University of North Texas, 2010
    Major: Kinesiology

Current Scheduled Teaching

PUBH 4080.400Public Health CapstoneSpring 2025
ADDS 4881.400Addictions PracticumFall 2024 Syllabus
RHAB 4880.400Rehabilitation PracticumFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ADDS 4881.900Addictions PracticumSummer 10W 2024 Syllabus
RHAB 4880.900Rehabilitation PracticumSummer 10W 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PUBH 4080.900Public Health CapstoneSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PUBH 4080.900Public Health CapstoneFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADDS 4881.900Addictions PracticumSummer 10W 2023
RHAB 4880.900Rehabilitation PracticumSummer 10W 2023 SPOT
PUBH 4080.900Public Health CapstoneSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PUBH 4080.900Public Health CapstoneFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE