Skip to main content

Joshua C. Habermann

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Conducting and Ensembles

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • DMA, University of Texas, 1997
    Major: Music
  • MMus, University of Texas, 1995
    Major: Music

Current Scheduled Teaching

MUAG 5811.400Choral Literature IIFall 2024 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUAG 5812.001Choral Literature IIISpring 2024 SPOT
MUAG 5810.001Choral Literature ISpring 2023 SPOT
MUAG 5811.002Choral Literature IIFall 2022 SPOT
MUAG 5812.001Choral Literature IIIFall 2021 SPOT
MUGC 5900.701Special ProblemsSummer 10W 2021
MUAG 5810.001Choral Literature ISpring 2021 SPOT
MUAG 5811.001Choral Literature IIFall 2020 SPOT
MUAG 5812.001Choral Literature IIIFall 2019
MUAG 4910.703Special ProblemsFall 2019
MUAG 5810.001Choral Literature ISpring 2019 SPOT
MUAG 5811.001Choral Literature IIFall 2018 SPOT
MUAG 5812.001Choral Literature IIISpring 2018 SPOT
MUAG 5810.001Choral Literature ISpring 2017 SPOT
MUAG 5811.001Choral Literature IIFall 2016 SPOT
MUAG 5812.001Choral Literature IIISpring 2016 SPOT
MUAG 5810.001Choral Literature ISpring 2015
MUAG 5811.001Choral Literature IIFall 2014
MUAG 5812.001Choral Literature IIISpring 2014
MUAG 5800.001Advanced Choral ConductingFall 2013
MUAG 5810.001Choral LiteratureSpring 2013
MUAG 5811.001Choral Literature IIFall 2012
MUAG 5810.001Choral LiteratureSpring 2012
MUAG 5800.001Advanced Choral ConductingFall 2011
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE