Faculty Profile

James Scott

Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Instrumental Studies
College
College of Music

    

Education

DMA, Peabody Conservatory, 1973.
Major: Dissertation: Structural Principles in Schoenberg's Song Cycle, Op. 15, and Their Anticipation in Some Late Works of Brahms
MM, Peabody Conservatory, 1966.
Major: Flute
MM, Peabody Conservatory, 1966.
Major: Piano
BM, Oberlin Conservatory, 1964.
Major: Flute and Piano

Current Scheduled Teaching*

MUGC 6954.744, Dissertation Recital, Fall 2022

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

MUGC 6954.737, Dissertation Recital, Spring 2022
MUAC 1508.704, FLUTE, Spring 2022 SPOT
MUAM 5508.704, Flute, Spring 2022 SPOT
MUAG 5701.720, Master's Recital, Spring 2022
MUAC 1508.704, FLUTE, Fall 2021 SPOT
MUAM 3508.704, Flute, Fall 2021 SPOT
MUAM 5508.704, Flute, Fall 2021 SPOT
MUAM 6508.704, Flute, Fall 2021 SPOT
MUCM 5510.512, String Chamber Music, Fall 2021
MUCM 5520Z.504, Woodwind Chamber Music, Fall 2021
MUAC 3508.704, FLUTE, Spring 2021 SPOT
MUAC 6508.704, FLUTE, Spring 2021 SPOT
MUAM 5508.704, Flute, Spring 2021 SPOT
MUAS 6508.704, Flute, Spring 2021 SPOT
MUGC 6954.744, Dissertation Recital, Fall 2020
MUAC 5508.704, FLUTE, Fall 2020 SPOT
MUAC 6508.704, FLUTE, Fall 2020 SPOT
MUAM 3508.704, Flute, Fall 2020 SPOT
MUAM 5508.704, Flute, Fall 2020 SPOT
MUAS 6508.704, Flute, Fall 2020 SPOT
MUGC 6953.703, Dissertation Recital, Summer 5W2 2020
MUGC 6954.737, Dissertation Recital, Spring 2020
MUAC 5508.704, FLUTE, Spring 2020
MUAM 3508.704, Flute, Spring 2020
MUAM 6508.704, Flute, Spring 2020
MUAS 6508.704, Flute, Spring 2020
MUGC 6954.744, Dissertation Recital, Fall 2019
MUAC 3508.704, FLUTE, Fall 2019 SPOT
MUAC 6508.704, FLUTE, Fall 2019 SPOT
MUAM 1508.704, Flute, Fall 2019 SPOT
MUAM 3508.704, Flute, Fall 2019 SPOT
MUAM 6508.704, Flute, Fall 2019 SPOT
MUAS 6508.704, Flute, Fall 2019 SPOT
MUAC 5508.704, FLUTE, Spring 2019 SPOT
MUAC 6508.704, FLUTE, Spring 2019 SPOT
MUAM 1508.704, Flute, Spring 2019 SPOT
MUAM 6508.704, Flute, Spring 2019 SPOT
MUAC 3508.709, FLUTE, Fall 2018 SPOT
MUAC 6508.704, FLUTE, Fall 2018 SPOT
MUAM 6508.704, Flute, Fall 2018 SPOT
MUAG 6910.702, Special Problems, Fall 2018
MUGC 6954.748, Dissertation Recital, Spring 2018
MUAC 1508.704, FLUTE, Spring 2018 SPOT
MUAC 6508.704, FLUTE, Spring 2018 SPOT
MUAM 6508.704, Flute, Spring 2018 SPOT
MUAS 3508.704, Flute, Spring 2018 SPOT
MUGC 6952.742, Dissertation Recital, Fall 2017
MUGC 6954.744, Dissertation Recital, Fall 2017
MUAC 3508.704, FLUTE, Fall 2017 SPOT
MUAM 6508.704, Flute, Fall 2017 SPOT
MUAS 6508.704, Flute, Fall 2017 SPOT
MUTH 5680.001, Proseminar in Music Theory, Fall 2017 SPOT
MUTH 6680.001, Proseminar in Music Theory, Fall 2017 SPOT
MUTH 5360.002, Analytical Techniques II, Spring 2017 SPOT
MUGC 6954.748, Dissertation Recital, Spring 2017
MUAC 6508.710, FLUTE, Spring 2017 SPOT
MUAM 6508.710, Flute, Spring 2017 SPOT
MUAS 6508.710, Flute, Spring 2017 SPOT
MUGC 6952.714, Dissertation Recital, Spring 2016
MUGC 6954.707, Dissertation Recital, Spring 2016
MUAM 3508.702, Flute, Spring 2016 SPOT
MUAM 5508.702, Flute, Spring 2016 SPOT
MUAM 6508.702, Flute, Spring 2016 SPOT
MUAC 6508.707, FLUTE, Spring 2008
MUAC 6508.707, FLUTE, Fall 2007

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE