Skip to main content

Jennifer Kraemer

Title: Lecturer

Department: English

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Texas at Dallas, 2018
    Major: Humanities
    Specialization: Studies in Literature
  • MA, University of Texas at Dallas, 2001
    Major: Humanities
    Specialization: Studies in Literature

Current Scheduled Teaching

ENGL 1310.009First Year Writing ISpring 2026 Syllabus
ENGL 1310.014First Year Writing ISpring 2026 Syllabus
ENGL 1310.018First Year Writing ISpring 2026 Syllabus
ENGL 2331.002World LiteratureSpring 2026 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ENGL 1320.009First Year Writing IIFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1320.023First Year Writing IIFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1320.026First Year Writing IIFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 3000.003Introduction to Literary AnalysisFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Conference Proceeding

  • Kraemer, J.D. (2017). Reforming Elizabeth: Shakespeare’s Henry VIII as Heritage Work.

    • Journal Article

  • Kraemer, J.D. (2019). Adapting True Crime: George Wilkins’s The Miseries of Inforst Marriage, the Tragedy of Wardship, and the Early Modern Court of Wards and Liveries.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE