Skip to main content

Janice E. Lader

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Merchandising and Digital Retailing

College: College of Merchandising, Hospitality and Tourism

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MEd, Regent University, 2017
    Major: Student Affairs
  • BA, Regent University, 2014
    Major: English - Communication

Current Scheduled Teaching

UCAR 1000Z.404Career Readiness Seminar ISpring 2025
UCAR 1000Z.404Career Readiness Seminar IFall 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

UCAR 1000Z.004Career Readiness Seminar ISpring 2024
UCAR 1000Z.004Career Readiness Seminar IFall 2023
UCAR 1000Z.004Career Readiness Seminar ISpring 2023
UCAR 1000Z.007Career Readiness Seminar ISpring 2023
BUSI 1200.001Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
UCAR 1000Z.004Career Readiness Seminar IFall 2022
CMHT 3450.001Effective Leadership CommunicationFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
CMHT 2790.001Career DevelopmentFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
CMHT 2790.002Career DevelopmentFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
CMHT 2790.003Career DevelopmentFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
CMHT 2790.001Career DevelopmentSpring 2020 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE