Skip to main content

Jennifer Stanley

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Design

College: College of Visual Arts and Design

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

ADES 3575.501Computers in Fashion : Concept to ProductSpring 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ADES 3575.501Computers in Fashion : Concept to ProductSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 3575.502Computers in Fashion : Concept to ProductSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 2550.501Fashion: Patternmaking IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 2550.502Fashion: Patternmaking IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1900.105Foundations: Systems and TransformationsSpring 2023 SPOT
ART 1900.106Foundations: Systems and TransformationsSpring 2023 SPOT
ADES 3550.501Fashion: DrapingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 3550.502Fashion: DrapingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1800.108Foundations: Narrative and RepresentationFall 2021 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Abstracts and Proceedings

  • Chen, C., Gam, H., Stanley, J. (2023). Collaborative teaching for creative possibility: The combination of technology and construction. 80 (1) Ames, IA, International Textile and Apparel AssociationAnnual Conference Proceedings/Iowa State University Digital Press. https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/itaa/article/id/17427/
  • Stanley, J., Gam, H., Chen, C. (2023). Using VR as a Conceptual Design Tool in an Apparel Design Classroom. International Textiles and Apparel Association.

    • Journal Article

  • Chen, C., Gam, H., Stanley, J. (2024). Unlocking creative potential: The synergy of technology and construction in collaborative teaching. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education. 12 (1) Oxfordshire, Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2024.2305974
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE