Skip to main content

James Mcneil

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Rehabilitation and Health Services

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, State University of New York at Buffalo, 2011
    Major: Rehabilitation Counseling
  • BS, Medaille University, 2008
    Major: Child and Youth Services

Current Scheduled Teaching

RHAB 5741.400Employment and Career DevelopmentSpring 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

RHAB 5700.401Ethical and Professional Foundations in Rehabilitation CounselingFall 2024 SPOT
RHAB 5710.400Multicultural Rehabilitation Counseling PracticeFall 2024 SPOT
RHAB 5734.400Psychopathology in Clinical Rehabilitation CounselingFall 2024 SPOT
RHAB 5715.900Disability Issues in Human DevelopmentSummer 10W 2024
RHAB 5741.900Employment and Career DevelopmentSummer 10W 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE