Faculty Profile
James Smith
Title
Clinical Associate Professor
Department
Marketing
College
College of Business
-
Business Leadership Building379F
- James.Smith3@unt.edu
- (940) 369-5276
Curriculum Vitae
Education
PhD, Texas A&M University, 2007.
Major: Marketing
Degree Specialization: Sales and Sales Management
Dissertation Title: SPIRITUALITY IN THE SALESPERSON: THE IMPACT OF THE GOLDEN RULE AND PERSONAL FAITH ON WORKPLACE JOB ATTITUDES
MBA, University of North Texas, 1997.
Major: Marketing
BBA, University of Texas- Tyler, 1975.
Major: Economics
Current Scheduled Teaching*
MKTG 4800.751, Internship in Marketing, Summer 2024
MKTG 5150.007, Marketing Management, Summer 2024
MKTG 4280.501, Global Marketing Issues and Practice, Spring 2024 Syllabus
MKTG 4800.751, Internship in Marketing, Spring 2024 Syllabus
MKTG 4800.752, Internship in Marketing, Spring 2024
MKTG 4600.001, Retailing, Spring 2024 Syllabus
* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
Previous Scheduled Teaching*
MKTG 4800.751, Internship in Marketing, Fall 2023 Syllabus
MKTG 4900.002, Special Problems, Fall 2023
MKTG 4800.751, Internship in Marketing, Spring 2023 Syllabus
MKTG 4805.700, Internship in Professional Selling, Spring 2022 Syllabus
MKTG 5850.007, Effective Marketing Planning in Dynamic Environments, Spring 2020 Syllabus
MKTG 3650.004, Foundations of Marketing Practice, Spring 2020 Syllabus
MKTG 3650.005, Foundations of Marketing Practice, Spring 2020 Syllabus
MKTG 4600.007, Retailing, Spring 2020 Syllabus
MKTG 5850.007, Effective Marketing Planning in Dynamic Environments, Spring 2019 SPOT
* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
Published Publications
Published Intellectual Contributions
Journal Article
Smith, J. G. (2024). The Effect of Forgiveness on Salesperson Attitudes and Outcomes: A Conceptual Framework. Marketing Management Journal. 33(2), Nine pages. Milwaukee, WI: Marketing Management Association. https://www.mmaglobal.org/volume-33-2023
Wright, M. K., Schroff, A. A., Smith, J. G. (2017). Marginal Propensity to Consume in Hungary: The Long Term Versus Short Term Challenges to Policy Makers. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research. 4(2), 1-7. St. Louis, MO: the Institute of Eastern Europe and Central Asia. https://www.ieeca.org/journal/index.php/JEECAR/about/contact
Smith, J. G. (2017). The Narcissistic Salesperson: A Framework of Their Relationships with Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, and Customer Orientation. Other. 6(2), 1-22. http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/amj
Smith, J. G., Futrell, C. M. (2014). The Inspired Salesperson: Linking Spirituality to Performance. Marketing Management Journal. 24(2), 14. mmaglobal.org
Smith, J. G. (2011). An Investigation of Market Orientation’s and Selected Personality Traits’ Relationship With Dimensions of Customer Orientation in Salespersons. 22(1), 97-110. mmaglobal.org
Smith, J. G. (2011). A Framework for Developing Customer Orientation in Ticket Sales Organizations. Sport Marketing Quarterly. 20(2), 93-102.
Smith, J. G., Chui, C. M. (2011). Mental Health Crisis on College Campuses: Can Spirituality Help Students Taking Marketing Courses Deal With Stress and Anxiety?. Journal of the Academy of Business Education. 12(Spring, 2011), 153-169.
| Overall Summative Rating |
Challenge and Engagement Index |
Response Rate |
|---|---|---|
out of 5 |
out of 7 |
% of students responded |
- Overall Summative Rating (median):
This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):- The course as a whole was
- The course content was
- The instructor’s contribution to the course was
- The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
- Challenge and Engagement Index:
This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):- Do you expect your grade in this course to be
- The intellectual challenge presented was
- The amount of effort you put into this course was
- The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
- Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was