Skip to main content

Jennifer A. Palcich

Title:

Department: Administrative Area

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, University of New Hampshire, 2005
    Major: Counseling
    Specialization: Mental Health
    Dissertation: A Model Leadership Curriculum for Managers of an Eden Alternative Nursing Home
  • BA, University of Dayton, 1998
    Major: Psychology and Communication

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

UCRS 4980.001Experimental CourseFall 2024 SPOT
UGST 1000.813Freshman SeminarFall 2013
UGST 1000.825Freshman SeminarFall 2013
UGST 1000.011Freshman SeminarFall 2012 Syllabus
UGST 1000.020Freshman SeminarFall 2012 Syllabus
UCRS 1000.012Freshman SeminarFall 2011 Syllabus
UCRS 2100.002Career DevelopmentFall 2010
UCRS 1000.009Freshman SeminarFall 2010
UCRS 2100.002Career DevelopmentSpring 2010
UCRS 2100.003Career DevelopmentSpring 2010
UCRS 2100.002Career DevelopmentFall 2009
UCRS 2100.003Career DevelopmentFall 2009
UCRS 2100.001Career DevelopmentSpring 2009
UCRS 2100.003Career DevelopmentSpring 2009
UCRS 2100.003Career DevelopmentFall 2008
UCRS 2100.006Career DevelopmentFall 2008
UCRS 2100.004Career DevelopmentSpring 2008
UCRS 2100.002Career DevelopmentFall 2007
UCRS 2100.006Career DevelopmentFall 2007
UCRS 2100.002Career DevelopmentSpring 2007
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE