Skip to main content

Jianhong Hu

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Keyboard Studies

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

MUAC 1501.714PIANOSpring 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUAG 1012.506Keyboard Skills for Music MajorsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 1501.714PIANOSpring 2024 SPOT
MUAG 1011.500Keyboard Skills for Music MajorsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 1011.508Keyboard Skills for Music MajorsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 1501.714PIANOFall 2023 SPOT
MUAG 1012.510Keyboard Skills for Music MajorsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 1501.714PIANOSpring 2023 SPOT
MUAS 1501.714PianoSpring 2023 SPOT
MUAC 1501.714PIANOFall 2022 SPOT
MUAG 1001.502Piano Class for Non Music MajorsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 1001.503Piano Class for Non Music MajorsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 1011.503Keyboard Skills for Music MajorsSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 1501.714PIANOSpring 2022 SPOT
MUAG 1011.514Keyboard Skills for Music MajorsFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 1012.503Keyboard Skills for Music MajorsFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 1501.714PIANOFall 2021 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE