Skip to main content

Jordana B. Hudson

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Counseling and Higher Education

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MEd, Texas A&M University - Commerce, 2019
    Major: Educational Administration
  • MA, Texas Woman's University, 2016
    Major: Teaching
  • MS, Texas Woman's University, 2010
    Major: Family Studies
  • BS, Texas Woman's University, 2005
    Major: Criminal Justice

Current Scheduled Teaching

COUN 2600.001Culture Centered Social and Emotional Learning in the SchoolsSpring 8W1 2025
COUN 2600.005Culture Centered Social and Emotional Learning in the SchoolsSpring 8W2 2025
COUN 4620.002Interpersonal Skills in Helping RelationshipsSpring 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

COUN 2610.002PRIN COUNSELING ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4070.002Teaching Diverse PopulationsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3830.001Teaching/Learning Process and EvaluationSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EPSY 2010.501How People LearnFall 8W1 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3830.002Teaching/Learning Process and EvaluationFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDEC 1010.003Learning With and From ChildrenSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3800.005Professional Issues in TeachingSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDEC 3750.006Young Children in Schools, Families and CommunitiesSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE