Skip to main content

Jennifer H. Duplessis

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Management

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, The University of Texas at Tyler, 2019
    Major: Human Resource Development
    Specialization: Organizational Development and Change
    Dissertation: Examining the Mediating Effect of Job Crafting on the Relationship Between Managerial Coaching and Job Engagement in the Skilled Trades
  • MBA, University of North Texas, 2006
    Major: Business Administration - Strategic Management
  • BBA, University of North Texas, 2000
    Major: Marketing

Current Scheduled Teaching

MGMT 3720.502Organizational BehaviorSpring 2025
MGMT 3720.502Organizational BehaviorFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MGMT 3720.502Organizational BehaviorSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 3720.502Organizational BehaviorFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 3720.502Organizational BehaviorFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 3850.004Foundations of EntrepreneurshipSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 3720.501Organizational BehaviorFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • DuPlessis, J.H. (2021). Examining the mediating effect of job crafting on the relationship between managerial coaching and job engagement among electricians in the U.S. skilled trades. Human Resource Development International. (2021) 1-28. Taylor Francis. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13678868.2021.1947696
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE