Skip to main content

Justin Lemons

Title: Assistant Librarian

Department: Library - Special Libraries

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2014
    Major: Information Science
  • BFA, University of North Texas, 2008
    Major: Studio Art - Drawing and Painting

Current Scheduled Teaching

INFO 5297.020Introduction to Special Materials PreservationSpring 2025
INFO 5900.401Special ProblemsSpring 2025
INFO 5297.020Introduction to Special Materials PreservationFall 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

INFO 5297.020Introduction to Special Materials PreservationFall 2023 SPOT
INFO 5900.702Special ProblemsSpring 2023
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Fellowship

  • Lemons, J., "Library of Congress Junior Fellows Summer Internship; Recorded Sound Division," sponsored by Library of Congress, Federal, $2900 Funded. (2013 - 2013).

    • Grant - Research

  • Huff, D.L., Fernandez, S., Sellers, S., Wolski, K.A., Lemons, J., "The Soundbox: A Music Engagement Lab," sponsored by University of North Texas Libraries, University of North Texas, $5000 Funded. (2022 - 2023).
  • Outhier, S., Huff, D.L., Lemons, J., "Don’t Fence Me In: Engaging Local Music Communities to Preserve Texas Music," sponsored by University of North Texas Libraries, University of North Texas, $5000 Funded. (2018 - 2019).
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE