Skip to main content

Jintak Kim

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Public Administration

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2023
    Major: Public Administration and Management
    Dissertation: Analyzing the Joint Effects of Network and Community Attributes on Network Performance: Evidence from Local Continuum of Care Homeless Service Networks

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PADM 3100.400Workplace ConflictFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PADM 3100.700Workplace ConflictFall 8W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PADM 3020.900Public ManagementFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PADM 3020.900Public ManagementSummer 8W1 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PADM 3020.002Public ManagementSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PADM 3020.001Public ManagementFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Keyes, L.M., Kim, J., , S., Ford, S.D. Missing Meals: How Transportation Impacts Food Access for the Transportation Disadvantaged. Urban Science. https://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/9/6/198
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE