Skip to main content

Junhyeon Kwon

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Seoul National University, 2021
    Major: Statistics

Current Scheduled Teaching

MATH 4650.001StatisticsSpring 2025
MATH 3680.004Applied StatisticsFall 2024 Syllabus
MATH 3680.201Applied StatisticsFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 3680.004Applied StatisticsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 3680.201Applied StatisticsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Kwon, J., Zheng, Y., Jun, M. (2023). Flexible spatio-temporal Hawkes process models for earthquake occurrences. Spatial Statistics. 54 Elsevier.
  • Lim, Y., Kwon, J., Oh, H. (2021). Principal component analysis in the wavelet domain. Pattern Recognition. 119 Elsevier.
  • Kim, J., Park, S., Kwon, J., Lim, Y., Oh, H. (2021). Estimation of spatio-temporal extreme distribution using a quantile factor model. Extremes. 24 Springer.
  • Kwon, J., Oh, H., Lim, Y. (2020). Dynamic principal component analysis with missing values. Journal of Applied Statistics. 47 (11) 1957-1969.
  • Park, S., Kwon, J., Kim, J., Oh, H. (2018). Prediction of extremal precipitation by quantile regression forests: from SNU Multiscale Team. Extremes. 21 463-476.
  • Kwon, J., Heo, T., Kim, J., Oh, H. (2018). A New P‐Wave Detector via Moving Empirical Cumulative Distribution Function. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (BSSA). 108 (4) 2080-2089.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE