Skip to main content

June Lee

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Jazz Studies

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

MUAC 1532.770Jazz PianoFall 2025
MUAC 1532.773Jazz PianoFall 2025
MUAC 3531.700Jazz PianoFall 2025
MUJS 5531.700Jazz PianoFall 2025

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUJS 3360.002Advanced Jazz ImprovisationSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUJS 1371.500Jazz Keyboard FundamentalsSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUJS 1132.503Jazz Performance Fundamentals IISpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 3531.701Jazz PianoSpring 2022 SPOT
MUAS 1501.724PianoSpring 2022 SPOT
MUAS 3501.730PianoSpring 2022 SPOT
MUJS 1371.502Jazz Keyboard FundamentalsFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 3531.771Jazz PianoFall 2021
MUJS 5900.704Special ProblemsFall 2021 SPOT
MUJS 4890.704Studies in JazzFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUJS 1371.500Jazz Keyboard FundamentalsSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUJS 1371.502Jazz Keyboard FundamentalsSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUJS 1132.503Jazz Performance Fundamentals IISpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUAS 3501.730PianoSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUJS 1371.500Jazz Keyboard FundamentalsFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
MUJS 1131.503Jazz Performance Fundamentals IFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 1532.770Jazz PianoFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
MUAS 3501.730PianoFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
MUJS 1371.500Jazz Keyboard FundamentalsSpring 2020 Syllabus
MUAC 3531.771Jazz PianoSpring 2020 Syllabus
MUJS 1371.501Jazz Keyboard FundamentalsFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 3531.701Jazz PianoFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 3531.771Jazz PianoFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE