Jingxi (Jeffery) Liao
Curriculum Vitae
Curriculum Vitae LinkCurrent Scheduled Teaching
| MATH 1680.120 | Elementary Probability and Statistics | Spring 2026 | ||
| MATH 1680.121 | Elementary Probability and Statistics | Spring 2026 | ||
| MATH 1680.122 | Elementary Probability and Statistics | Spring 2026 | ||
| MATH 1680.123 | Elementary Probability and Statistics | Spring 2026 | ||
| MATH 1680.170 | Elementary Probability and Statistics | Spring 2026 | ||
| MATH 1680.171 | Elementary Probability and Statistics | Spring 2026 | ||
| MATH 1680.172 | Elementary Probability and Statistics | Spring 2026 | ||
| MATH 1680.173 | Elementary Probability and Statistics | Spring 2026 | ||
| MATH 3860.001 | Financial Mathematics | Spring 2026 | ||
| MATH 1780.001 | Probability Models | Spring 2026 | ||
| MATH 1180.004 | College Math for Business, Economics and Related Fields | Fall 2025 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| MATH 1180.009 | College Math for Business, Economics and Related Fields | Fall 2025 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| MATH 1780.002 | Probability Models | Fall 2025 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| MATH 1780.420 | Probability Models | Fall 2025 | Syllabus | SPOT |
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
Previous Scheduled Teaching
No previous courses scheduled.
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
| Overall Summative Rating |
Challenge and Engagement Index |
Response Rate |
|---|---|---|
out of 5 |
out of 7 |
% of students responded |
-
Overall Summative Rating (median):
This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):- The course as a whole was
- The course content was
- The instructor’s contribution to the course was
- The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
-
Challenge and Engagement Index:
This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):- Do you expect your grade in this course to be
- The intellectual challenge presented was
- The amount of effort you put into this course was
- The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
- Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was