Skip to main content

Jason L. Cooley

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Multidisciplinary Innovation

College: College of Applied and Collaborative Studies

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Texas at Dallas, 2010
    Major: Public Affairs

Current Scheduled Teaching

BAAS 3000.401Pathways to Civic EngagementSpring 2025

Previous Scheduled Teaching

BAAS 3000.703Pathways to Civic EngagementSummer 8W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.701Pathways to Civic EngagementSpring 8W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.900Pathways to Civic EngagementFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.900Pathways to Civic EngagementSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.501Pathways to Civic EngagementFall 8W1 2022 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.501Pathways to Civic EngagementSummer 8W1 2022 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.501Pathways to Civic EngagementSpring 8W1 2022 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.070Pathways to Civic EngagementFall 8W2 2021 SPOT
BAAS 3000.501Pathways to Civic EngagementFall 8W1 2021 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.501Pathways to Civic EngagementSummer 8W1 2021 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.901Pathways to Civic EngagementSpring 8W2 2021 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.500Pathways to Civic EngagementFall 8W1 2020 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.501Pathways to Civic EngagementFall 8W2 2020 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.904Pathways to Civic EngagementFall 8W1 2020 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.954Pathways to Civic EngagementFall 8W1 2020 SPOT
BAAS 3000.500Pathways to Civic EngagementSpring 2020
BAAS 3000.904Pathways to Civic EngagementSpring 2020 Syllabus
BAAS 3000.070Pathways to Civic EngagementFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.904Pathways to Civic EngagementFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE