Skip to main content

Jenny Gnau

Title:

Department: Biological Sciences

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2017
    Major: Biology
    Dissertation: Evaluating the Role of UV Exposure and Recovery Regimes in PAH Photo-Induced Toxicity

Current Scheduled Teaching

BIOL 2141.501Ecology LaboratorySpring 2025 Syllabus
BIOL 2141.502Ecology LaboratorySpring 2025 Syllabus
BIOL 2141.503Ecology LaboratorySpring 2025 Syllabus
BIOL 1132.301Environmental ScienceSpring 2025 Syllabus
BIOL 1132.302Environmental ScienceSpring 2025 Syllabus
BIOL 1132.303Environmental ScienceSpring 2025 Syllabus
BIOL 1132.306Environmental ScienceSpring 2025 Syllabus
BIOL 1132.307Environmental ScienceSpring 2025 Syllabus
BIOL 1132.308Environmental ScienceSpring 2025 Syllabus
BIOL 1132.311Environmental ScienceSpring 2025 Syllabus
BIOL 1132.312Environmental ScienceSpring 2025 Syllabus
BIOL 1132.314Environmental ScienceSpring 2025 Syllabus
BIOL 1132.315Environmental ScienceSpring 2025 Syllabus
BIOL 1132.316Environmental ScienceSpring 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE