Skip to main content

Javetta L. Jones-Roberson

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Teacher Education and Administration

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MEd, Texas A&M University-Commerce, 2011
    Major: Educational Administration

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDCI 4070.002Teaching Diverse PopulationsSpring 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDCI 4070.003Teaching Diverse PopulationsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4070.001Teaching Diverse PopulationsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 1010.010Teaching as Advocacy for EquityFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4070.001Teaching Diverse PopulationsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4070.003Teaching Diverse PopulationsSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4070.002Teaching Diverse PopulationsFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4070.003Teaching Diverse PopulationsSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4070.003Teaching Diverse PopulationsFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Hodges, J., Mun, R., Jones Roberson, J., Flemister, C. Educator Perceptions Following Changes in Gifted Education Policy: Implications for Serving Gifted Students. Gifted Child Quarterly.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE