Skip to main content

Jacy Manning

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • AUD, University of North Texas, 2021
    Major: Audiology
  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2021
    Major: Health Services Research - Audiology and Speech Language
    Dissertation: Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Speech Perception Outcomes in Adults with Cochlear Implants

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ASLP 3030.001Speech and Hearing SciencesSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ASLP 3030.003Speech and Hearing SciencesFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ASLP 4045.900Basic Rehabilitative AudiologySpring 2020 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Wolfe, J., Duke, M., Miller, S., Schafer, E.C., Jones, C., Rakita, L., Dunn, A., Battles, J., Neumann, S., Manning , J. (2022). Low-level speech recognition of children with hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE