Skip to main content

Jenn L. Washburn

Title: Associate Librarian

Department: Library - Special Libraries

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2013
    Major: Information Science
  • BA, Concordia University, 2009
    Major: English

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

INFO 5600.002Information Access and Knowledge InquiryFall 2021 SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Review

  • Stayton, J. (2019). Review of Transforming Academic Library Instruction: Shifting Teaching Practices to Reflect Changed Perspectives.. College & Research Libraries. College & Research Libraries. 80(7) 1055-1056.
  • Stayton, J. (2019). Brief Reviews of Books and Products. We Can Do IT: Women in Library Information Technology.. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 7(1) 2320.
  • Journal Article

  • Venner, M., Washburn, J. (2021). A Peer-to-Peer Service Approach in Academic Libraries. Journal of Access Services. Taylor & Francis Online. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15367967.2021.1924065

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Roy, M. (Principal), Stayton, J. (Supporting), Ratjit, U. (Supporting), "Aim for accessibility: Creating accessible LibGuides for library patrons," sponsored by UNT Libraries, University of North Texas, $5000 Funded. (2020 - 2021).
  • Stayton, J. (Principal), Bajracharya, A. (Supporting), Chung, F. (Supporting), "Gail Schlachter Memorial Research Grant," sponsored by RUSA, American Library Association, National, $5000 Funded. (2020 - 2021).
  • Stayton, J. (Principal), Bajracharya, A. (Supporting), Chung, F. (Supporting), "Gail Schlachter Memorial Research Grant," sponsored by RUSA, American Library Association, National, Funded. (2020 - 2021).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE