Skip to main content

Jennifer Schwartz

Title: Clinical Professor

Department: Psychology

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Idaho State University, 2004
    Major: Clinical Psychology
  • MS, Idaho State University, 2001
    Major: Psychology

Current Scheduled Teaching

PSYC 6830.703PracticumSpring 2025
PSYC 6820.702PracticumFall 2024

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PSYC 6830.704PracticumSpring 2024 SPOT
PSYC 6820.704PracticumFall 2023 SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Schwartz, J. (2023). Thompson, S. M., Keenan-Miller, D., Dunn, D., Hersh, J., Saules, K. K., Graham, S. R., Bell, D. J., Hames, J. L., Wray, A., Hiraoka, R., Heller, M. B., Taber-Thomas, S. M., Taylor, M. J., Hawkins, R. C. II, Schacht, R. L., Liu, N. H., Schwartz, J. L., & Akey, E. H. (2023). Preferences for and acceptability of telesupervision among health service psychology trainees..
  • Peer-Reviewed Bulletin

  • Schwartz, J. (2023). Sodowick, L., Hartman, A., Geller, P., Schwartz, J., Posmontier, B., & Horowitz, J. (2023). The benefits of housing intensive outpatient programs in psychology training clinics through the lens of Drexel University’s Mother Baby Connections program.. Association of Psychology Training Clinics Bulletin: Practicum and Training..

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Teaching

  • Cicero, D.C. (Principal), Schwartz, J. (Co-Principal), "The North Texas-20: Expanding Integrated, Interdisciplinary Behavioral Health Doctoral Psychology Training into Community-Based Primary Care across 20 High Need, High Demand Areas of North Texas," sponsored by Health Resources and Service Administration, Federal, $1294938 Funded. (2022 - 2025).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE