Skip to main content

Jeonghye Nah

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Teacher Education and Administration

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDEC 1010.002Learning With and From ChildrenSpring 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDEC 1010.004Learning With and From ChildrenFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDEC 1010.003Learning With and From ChildrenSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Handbook Chapter

  • Nxumalo, F., Perez, M.S., Barces, A., Castillo, J., Doherty, M.J., Holmes, Z., Nah, J., Phillips, I. (2024). Insights on feminist transdisciplinarity and Dr. Fikile Nxumalo’s ‘Decolonizing place in early childhood education (pp. 350-355).. In J. B. Ulmer, C, Hughes, M.S. Perez, & C.A. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of transdisciplinary feminist research and methodological praxis. Routledge.

    • Journal Article

  • Kim, K., Han, M., Son, J., Nah, J. (2023). From stuck in a dark tunnel to shining new light: Stories of Korean early childhood practitioners during the pandemic. Other. 17 (1) 25-47. Pacific Early Childhood Education Research Association (International).
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE