Skip to main content

John Schroeder

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: ADA - Advanced Data Analytics

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1995
    Major: Mathematics and Statistics
    Specialization: Applied Mathematics & Statistics (Pure)

Current Scheduled Teaching

ADTA 5130.400Data Analytics IFall 8W1 2024
IPAC 4130.100Data Analytics and Computational Statistics 1Summer 8W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADTA 5130.400Data Analytics ISummer 8W1 2024 SPOT

Previous Scheduled Teaching

IPAC 4130.100Data Analytics and Computational Statistics 1Summer 8W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADTA 5130.400Data Analytics ISummer 8W1 2024 SPOT
IPAC 4130.400Data Analytics and Computational Statistics 1Spring 8W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADTA 5130.400Data Analytics ISpring 8W1 2024 SPOT
ADTA 5120.410Introduction to Data AnalyticsSpring 8W2 2024 SPOT
IPAC 4130.110Data Analytics and Computational Statistics 1Fall 8W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADTA 5130.110Data Analytics IFall 8W2 2023 SPOT
IPAC 4130.110Data Analytics and Computational Statistics 1Spring 8W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADTA 5130.102Data Analytics ISpring 8W1 2023 SPOT
ADTA 5130.110Data Analytics ISpring 8W2 2023 SPOT
ADTA 5130.111Data Analytics ISpring 8W2 2023 SPOT
IPAC 4130.100Data Analytics and Computational Statistics 1Fall 8W1 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ADTA 5130.100Data Analytics IFall 8W1 2022 SPOT
IPAC 4130.110Data Analytics and Computational Statistics 1Spring 8W2 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ADTA 5130.110Data Analytics ISpring 8W2 2022 SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE