Skip to main content

Jill R. Kaiser

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • BS, University of North Texas, 2016
    Major: Mathematics

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1710.161Calculus ISpring 2024 SPOT
MATH 1710.163Calculus ISpring 2024 SPOT
MATH 1720.122Calculus IIFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1720.123Calculus IIFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1650.500Pre CalculusSummer 10W 2023 Syllabus
MATH 2700.008Linear Algebra and Vector GeometrySpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1710.111Calculus IFall 2022 SPOT
MATH 1710.112Calculus IFall 2022 SPOT
MATH 2000.002Discrete MathematicsSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1650.120Pre CalculusFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1650.121Pre CalculusFall 2021
MATH 1650.122Pre CalculusFall 2021
MATH 1650.123Pre CalculusFall 2021
MATH 1580.500Survey of Mathematics with ApplicationsSummer 5W1 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1720.410Calculus IIFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1710.410Calculus ISpring 2020 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE