Skip to main content

Jiaqi Sun

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Music History, Theory and Ethnomusicology

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

MUTH 1350.001Explorations in Music 2Spring 2025
MUTH 1300.001Explorations in Music IFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUTH 2510.001Aural Skills IVSummer 5W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1410.001Aural Skills ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1410.002Aural Skills ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 2510.001Aural Skills IVFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 2510.005Aural Skills IVFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1510.001Aural Skills IISummer 5W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 2410.002Aural Skills IIISpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 2410.003Aural Skills IIISpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 2410.003Aural Skills IIIFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 2410.004Aural Skills IIIFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 2410.011Aural Skills IIIFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1510.002Aural Skills IISpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1510.006Aural Skills IISpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1410.005Aural Skills IFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1410.011Aural Skills IFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE