Skip to main content

John W. Johns

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Media Arts

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MEd, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, 2021
    Major: Educational Technology

Current Scheduled Teaching

MRTS 4411.001Video Production TopicsSpring 2025
MRTS 4411.001Video Production TopicsFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MRTS 4411.003Video Production TopicsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 4411.003Video Production TopicsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 4911.001Special Problems in Video ProductionSummer 10W 2023
MRTS 4911.710Special Problems in Video ProductionSpring 2023
MRTS 4911.710Special Problems in Video ProductionFall 2022
MRTS 4900.755Special ProblemsSummer 10W 2022
MRTS 4740.001Theories and Techniques of Visual EditingSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 4740.002Theories and Techniques of Visual EditingSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 4740.001Theories and Techniques of Visual EditingFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 5740.001Theory and Technique of Visual EditingFall 2021 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE