Skip to main content

Kyndell Brianna Bailey

Title: Lecturer

Department: Accounting

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • BBA, University of Texas at Arlington, 2016
    Major: Accounting
  • MS, University of Texas at Arlington, 2016
    Major: Taxation

Current Scheduled Teaching

ACCT 2010.003Accounting Principles I (Financial Accounting)Spring 2025
ACCT 2010.007Accounting Principles I (Financial Accounting)Spring 2025
ACCT 2010.010Accounting Principles I (Financial Accounting)Spring 2025
ACCT 2020.003Accounting Principles II (Managerial Accounting)Spring 2025
ACCT 2010.007Accounting Principles I (Financial Accounting)Fall 2024 Syllabus
ACCT 2010.012Accounting Principles I (Financial Accounting)Fall 2024 Syllabus
ACCT 2020.005Accounting Principles II (Managerial Accounting)Fall 2024 Syllabus
ACCT 2020.009Accounting Principles II (Managerial Accounting)Fall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE