Skip to main content

Kara B. Griffin

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Anthropology

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

ANTH 5032.400Ethnographic and Qualitative Methods for Non MajorsSpring 2025
ANTH 3710.400Peoples and Cultures of East AsiaSpring 2025
ANTH 5032.400Ethnographic and Qualitative Methods for Non MajorsFall 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ANTH 5032.200Ethnographic and Qualitative Methods for Non MajorsSpring 2024 SPOT
ANTH 3710.200Peoples and Cultures of East AsiaSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 5032.200Ethnographic and Qualitative Methods for Non MajorsFall 2023 SPOT
ANTH 5032.200Ethnographic and Qualitative Methods for Non MajorsSpring 2023 SPOT
ANTH 3710.200Peoples and Cultures of East AsiaSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 5032.200Ethnographic and Qualitative Methods for Non MajorsFall 2022 SPOT
ANTH 4701.050Topics in Sociocultural AnthropologySpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 3101.501American Culture and SocietyFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 3710.100Peoples and Cultures of East AsiaFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE