Skip to main content

Kelly Berthiaume

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Educational Psychology

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Florida State University, 2020
    Major: Human Development and Family Sciences
  • MS, Florida State University, 2016
    Major: Family and Child Services

Current Scheduled Teaching

HDFS 4133.001Adolescence and Emerging AdulthoodFall 2024 Syllabus
HDFS 2313.002Courtship and MarriageFall 2024 Syllabus
HDFS 3113.002Infant and Child DevelopmentFall 2024 Syllabus
EPSY 5990.420Supervised Research or Program EvaluationFall 2024

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EPSY 5550.020Learning TheoriesSummer 5W2 2024 SPOT
EPSY 5990.020Supervised Research or Program EvaluationSummer 10W 2024
HDFS 2313.001Courtship and MarriageSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 3413.001Grief, Loss and BereavementSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 2033.001ParentingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EPSY 5990.020Supervised Research or Program EvaluationSpring 2024
HDFS 2313.002Courtship and MarriageFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 3423.030Family, School, and CommunityFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 2033.001ParentingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EPSY 5990.020Supervised Research or Program EvaluationFall 2023
EPSY 5990.020Supervised Research or Program EvaluationSummer 10W 2023
HDFS 3123.021Child Development for Non MajorsSummer 5W2 2022 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Acar, S., Berthiaume, K., Johnson, R. (2023). What kind of questions do creative people ask?. Other. 33 (3) 100062. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100062
  • Grajzel, K., Acar, S., Dumas, D., Organisciak, P., Berthiaume, K. Measuring flexibility: A text-mining approach. Frontiers in Psychology. 13 Frontiers Media SA. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1093343
  • Organisciak, P., Acar, S., Dumas, D., Berthiaume, K. (2023). Beyond semantic distance: Automated scoring of divergent thinking greatly improves with large language models. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 49 101356. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101356
  • Dumas, D., Acar, S., Berthiaume, K., Organisciak, P., Eby, D., Grajzel, K., Vlaamster, T., Newman, M., Carrera, M. (2023). What Makes Children's Responses to Creativity Assessments Difficult to Judge Reliably?. Other. 57 (3) 419-438. Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jocb.588
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE