Faculty Profile

Katherine McBain

Title
Senior Lecturer
Department
Instrumental Studies
College
College of Music

    

Education

DMA, University of Rochester, 2008.
Major: Performance and Literature
Degree Specialization: Horn
MM, University of Rochester, 2001.
Major: Performance and Literature
Degree Specialization: Horn

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

MUEN 2602.501, Brass Ensembles, Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUEN 5602.501, Brass Ensembles, Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 1514.702, FRENCH HORN, Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 3514.702, FRENCH HORN, Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUAM 1514.702, French Horn, Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 4360.001, Instrumental Pedagogy and Repertoire, Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 5360.001, Instrumental Pedagogy and Repertoire, Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUEN 2602.501, Brass Ensembles, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUEN 5602.501, Brass Ensembles, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 1514.702, FRENCH HORN, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 3514.702, FRENCH HORN, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUAM 1514.702, French Horn, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE