Skip to main content

Kelly C. Sevin

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Rehabilitation and Health Services

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, Richmont Graduate University, 2012
    Major: Marriage and Family Therapy
    Specialization: Christian Sex Therapy

Current Scheduled Teaching

ADDS 4075.400Drugs and AlcoholFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ADDS 4275.400Alcohol, Drugs and DisabilitySummer 10W 2025 Syllabus SPOT
ADDS 4075.400Drugs and AlcoholFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADDS 4275.900Alcohol, Drugs and DisabilitySummer 10W 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADDS 3975.900AddictionsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADDS 4275.900Alcohol, Drugs and DisabilityFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADDS 4075.900Drugs and AlcoholFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADDS 3975.900AddictionsSpring 2023 SPOT
ADDS 4075.900Drugs and AlcoholFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ADDS 3975.900AddictionsSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ADDS 4075.900Drugs and AlcoholFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 3975.900AddictionsFall 2020 SPOT
RHAB 3975.950AddictionsFall 2020 SPOT
RHAB 4075.900Drugs and AlcoholSpring 2020 Syllabus
RHAB 3975.001AddictionsFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE