Skip to main content

Katie Klein

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Information Science

College: College of Information

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

INFO 5420.401Literature for Youth in School LibrariesFall 2025
INFO 5345.401School Library Program DevelopmentFall 2025

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Conference Proceeding

  • Church, A., Croft, M., Everhart, N., Farmer, L., Klein, K., Marquardt, L., Oberg, D. (2025). Principals and librarians: Partners for quality education.
  • Freeburg, D., Klein, K. (2024). Customer service, hard work, and normativity: Identity standards encoded into public library routines.
  • Freeburg, D., Klein, K. (2024). Who am I? How public library staff manage conflicting information about the self‐concept.
  • Freeburg, D., Klein, K. (2022). What guides knowledge work in the library? Maps, routines, and workarounds.
  • Journal Article

  • Freeburg, D., Klein, K. (2025). Be who we all want you to be: Navigating identity regulation in the public library.
  • Freeburg, D., Klein, K. (2025). Who am I? How public library staff manage conflicting information about the self-concept.
  • Freeburg, D., Klein, K. (2024). Are library staff autonomous? The influence of routines and the development of workarounds.
  • Klein, K. (2023). “What library?” A survey of charter school leaders about school library services. School Libraries Worldwide.
  • Magazine/Trade Publication

  • Klein, K., Harrison, A., Burgess, R. (2024). Q and A: How to build relationships in nontraditional schools.
  • Klein, K. (2024). What about charter school libraries? Understanding library services in charter schools.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE