Skip to main content

Kenny E. Ross

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Instrumental Studies

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

MUGC 4890.001Studies in MusicSpring 2026
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUGC 4890.001Studies in MusicFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MUCM 3530.516Brass Chamber MusicSpring 2025 SPOT
MUAC 1517.707TROMBONESpring 2025 SPOT
MUAS 1517.707TromboneSpring 2025 SPOT
MUAG 1102.500High Brass MethodsSpring 2024 SPOT
MUAG 1202.502Low Brass MethodsSpring 2024 SPOT
MUAG 1202.500Low Brass MethodsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 1202.502Low Brass MethodsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 1102.501High Brass MethodsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 1202.500Low Brass MethodsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 1102.500High Brass MethodsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 1102.501High Brass MethodsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 1102.501High Brass MethodsSpring 2022 SPOT
MUAG 1202.501Low Brass MethodsSpring 2022 SPOT
MUAG 1102.502High Brass MethodsFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 1202.500Low Brass MethodsFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE