Skip to main content

Keith Fewell

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Merchandising and Digital Retailing

College: College of Merchandising, Hospitality and Tourism

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • BGS, Texas Tech University, 2019
    Major: General Studies (History, English, and Sociology)

Current Scheduled Teaching

CMHT 2560.401Food Retailing: Issues and TrendsSpring 2025
CMHT 2560.402Food Retailing: Issues and TrendsSpring 2025
CMHT 2560.401Food Retailing: Issues and TrendsFall 2024 Syllabus
CMHT 2560.402Food Retailing: Issues and TrendsFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

CMHT 2560.001Food Retailing: Issues and TrendsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CMHT 2560.002Food Retailing: Issues and TrendsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CMHT 2560.001Food Retailing: Issues and TrendsFall 2023 SPOT
CMHT 2560.002Food Retailing: Issues and TrendsFall 2023 SPOT
CMHT 2560.001Food Retailing: Issues and TrendsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
CMHT 2560.002Food Retailing: Issues and TrendsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
CMHT 2560.001Food Retailing: Issues and TrendsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
CMHT 2560.001Food Retailing: Issues and TrendsFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
CMHT 2980.001Experimental CourseSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
CMHT 2980.002Experimental CourseSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
CMHT 2980.001Experimental CourseFall 2020 SPOT
CMHT 2980.002Experimental CourseFall 2020 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE