Skip to main content

Kimberly Grey

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: English

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Cincinnati, 2021
    Major: Comparative Literature
    Specialization: Creative Writing
    Dissertation: A Mother Is an Intellectual Thing: Essays (creative) "Death Images: Narrative Emergence of the Trauma Story in the Work of Roland Bathes (critical)
  • MFA, Adelphi University, 2009
    Major: Creative Writing
    Specialization: Poetry
    Dissertation: The Opposite of Light: Poems

Current Scheduled Teaching

ENGL 4120.001Advanced Creative Nonfiction WritingFall 2025 Syllabus
ENGL 5162.001Creative Writing : Creative NonfictionFall 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ENGL 3160.002Beginning Creative Nonfiction WritingSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 3150.003Beginning Poetry WritingSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 3150.004Beginning Poetry WritingSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 3150.001Beginning Poetry WritingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 3150.002Beginning Poetry WritingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.036First Year Writing IFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book

  • Grey, K. (2020). System for the Future of Feeling. New York, NY, Persea Books.
  • Grey, K. (2016). The Opposite of Light: Poems. (1st) 64. New York, NY, Persea Books.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE