Skip to main content

Kjirsten A. Hagedorn

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Dance and Theatre

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MFA, Southern Methodist University, 2018
    Major: Theatre
  • BFA, Stephens College, 2009
    Major: Theatre Arts

Current Scheduled Teaching

THEA 3030.401World Theatre to 1700.Fall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

THEA 1050.003Acting : FundamentalsSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
THEA 1050.303Acting : FundamentalsSpring 2022 Syllabus
THEA 4350.002Senior SeminarSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
THEA 4350.302Senior SeminarSpring 2022 Syllabus
THEA 4350.002Senior SeminarFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
THEA 4350.302Senior SeminarFall 2021
THEA 2051.001Theatre Voice IFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
THEA 2051.003Theatre Voice IFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
THEA 2051.301Theatre Voice IFall 2021
THEA 2051.303Theatre Voice IFall 2021
THEA 4350.001Senior SeminarSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
THEA 4350.301Senior SeminarSpring 2021
THEA 2051.002Theatre Voice ISpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
THEA 2051.302Theatre Voice ISpring 2021
THEA 2051.003Theatre Voice IFall 2020 SPOT
THEA 2051.303Theatre Voice IFall 2020
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE