Skip to main content

Katelyn Matkin

Title: Clinical Assistant Professor

Department: Rehabilitation and Health Services

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

RHAB 4700.400Employment ServicesFall 2024 Syllabus
RHAB 5723.400Group Work and the Rehabilitation ProcessFall 2024
RHAB 5732.401Principles of Psychiatric Rehabilitation and RecoveryFall 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Matkin, K., Smedema, S., Baumunk, M., Chun, J., Bhattarai, M. Black and African American Individuals’ Pregnancy with Fibromyalgia: Desired vs. Received Support. N/A.
  • Weathers Jr., M., Matkin, K. (2024). Have we responded to the call? A 25 year follow up on multicultural rehabilitation changes. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling. N/A. 55 (1) N/A. NY, NY, Springer Publishing Company LLC. https://doi.org/10.1891/JARC-2023-0021
  • McCarthy, A., Matkin, K. A content analysis of rehabilitation counseling supervision literature.
  • Chun, J.n., Lee, J.n., Matkin, K., Richard, C., Khan, U.N., Smedema, S.N. Bimodality in life satisfaction: Robust social support enhances life satisfaction in individuals with long COVID. N/A. N/A (N/A) N/A. N/A, ScienceDirect. N/A
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE