Skip to main content

Karan Kakroo

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Mechanical Engineering

College: College of Engineering

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

MEEN 3242.001Mechanical and Energy Engineering Laboratory IISpring 2025
MEEN 3242.301Mechanical and Energy Engineering Laboratory IISpring 2025
MEEN 3242.303Mechanical and Energy Engineering Laboratory IISpring 2025
MEEN 3242.304Mechanical and Energy Engineering Laboratory IISpring 2025
MEEN 3242.305Mechanical and Energy Engineering Laboratory IISpring 2025
MEEN 3242.307Mechanical and Energy Engineering Laboratory IISpring 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MEEN 3242.001Mechanical and Energy Engineering Laboratory IISummer 10W 2024 SPOT
MEEN 3242.101Mechanical and Energy Engineering Laboratory IISummer 10W 2024 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Abstracts and Proceedings

  • Kakroo, K., Sadat, H. (2024). High-Fidelity Simulations of Single and Tandem Perforated Elastic Vortex Generators. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. American Physical Society.

    • Journal Article

  • Kakroo, K., Sadat, H. (2024). High-fidelity fluid–structure interaction simulations of perforated elastic vortex generators. Other. 36 (11) AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0234900
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE